Innovation leaders: a breed different from corporate managers
(3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ...Ian MacMillan and Rita McGrath (both taught at a Spring 08 Columbia Business School program I attended) in an HBR article say “Most profitable strategies are built on differentiation: offering customers something they value that competitors don’t have.” And Harsh Mariwala, Chairman & MD, Marico Ltd says, “… innovation is the fountainhead for differentiation.” The importance of innovation in business is clear.
However, to most companies and managers, it is not clear where such innovation might come from. If you turn to management guru Tom Peters, his answer is “The #1 source of innovation is pissed-off people.” These are people that are annoyed with the status quo. They want something different and much better. How would you identify such people? How would you encourage and retain such people in your organization? How would you actually get them to innovate? Here’s how: start by creating a senior leadership position in innovation. These innovation leaders will stimulate, sponsor, steer, and sustain innovation in your organization.
As Dr R A Mashelkar (Chair, National Innovation Foundation) says, “Unfortunately, the “I” in “ India ” has stood for imitation and inhibition for too long. It’s high time it stood for innovation.” Thankfully, a few organizations are taking initiatives to drive change. For example, NASSCOM runs an Innovation Initiative to encourage and support innovative practices across India’s IT Industry. NASSCOM knows that the next phase of growth has to be driven through Innovation – in technologies, products, and processes.
Some companies are responding. They are launching innovation groups and creating innovation leader positions. The problem is these groups are mostly trendwatching groups. So, the objective simply is to identify hot technologies invented elsewhere so the company can train and be ready. And the “innovation leaders” in these companies are good managers, but may not have Innovation leadership capabilities. They are often senior managers who are given Innovation as an additional responsibility. They may not have a track-record in innovation.
Who might qualify to be an Innovation leader? It is important to know a fundamental fact: Good corporate leaders need not be good innovation leaders. Innovation leadership is distinct from other mainstream types of corporate/project leadership. This is obvious if you are an innovation practitioner/leader like me, but “mainstream” managers may find it hard to believe. The position requires a special form of leadership and Jean-Philippe Deschamps, former VP at Arthur D. Little lists the following six attributes for an innovation leader:
- An unusual combination of creativity and process discipline
- The acceptance of uncertainty, risks and failures, coupled with an urge to make their staff learn from them
- A high degree of passion for their mission and for innovation, as well as the burning desire to share this passion with the staff
- The willingness to proactively search for external technologies and ideas and then to experiment with them
- The courage to stop projects, not just ot start them, and the flair to decide when to persist vs. when to pull the plug
- A talent for building and steering winning teams and a knack for attracting and retaining innovators.
To that list, I must add two very important capabilities:
- Change leadership: have you successfully executed any change initiative in your organization, preferably an innovation-driven Change initiative?
- Corporate entrepreneurship: have you launched successful groups or COEs?
With this new leadership position created and reporting preferably into the CEO, the organization has taken the first and most important step in driving growth and differentiation through innovation.
Post Contributed by Pradeep Henry
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Hi,
The identification that persons-to-innovate are those ‘pissed-off’ is very correct. I like it; but one thing to add is that – they should be pissed-off, yet try to contribute in a positive way to progress. Mostly they turn out to be vocally critical. They should be action-oriented and positive in outlook.
The other point I like is that the business leaders and innovation leaders could be different. It is mostly true in my opinion since they cannot pay so much attention to numbers while paying attention to so many other critical factors; or numbers might take a lower priority in their order of attention.
If one is able to pay attention to numbers too while looking after innovation WE HAVE A TRUE BUISNESS INNOVATION LEADER in them. That could be asking for too much, but one never knows…
Nalini